Measuring performance

Dip Checks Summary Table

Our office carries out regularly random dip-checks of complaint outcomes provided by the Surrey Police Professional Standards Department (PSD) in order to identify learning and improve the service that every person who contacts the Force receives.

The below table shows the outcomes of random dip checks of Surrey Police complaint outcomes performed by our office between January 2023 to present:

Public Ref.Dip-Check DateTheme/sSummaryOutcome of Dip-CheckLearning or Recommendation Theme
Q4 2022/23     
DC110/01/2023Race discriminationVehicle stop.No evidence of discrimination, complaint dealt with appropriately.None
DC213/01/2023Unprofessional attitude and Race discriminationLack of contact.No evidence of discrimination, complaint dealt with appropriately.None.
DC313/01/2023Race discriminationOfficer conduct.No evidence of discrimination, complaint handled appropriately.None.
DC427/01/2023Race discriminationOfficer conduct.Allegations withdrawn, complaint handled appropriately.None.
Q1 2023/24     
DC524/04/2023Race discriminationVehicle stop.No evidence of discrimination. Satisfied complaint handled appropriately but some learning was identified.Cultural awareness.
DC605/05/2023Recruitment checksPolice Constable application rejected.Satisfied decision to reject was appropriate and rationale was sound.None
DC705/05/2023Recruitment checksPolice Constable application rejected.Satisfied decision to reject was appropriate and rationale was sound.None.
DC805/05/2023Recruitment checksDetective degree holder entry application rejected.Satisfied decision to reject was appropriate and rationale was sound.None.
DC905/05/2023Recruitment checksPolice Constable application rejected.Satisfied decision to reject was appropriate and rationale was sound.None.
DC1029/06/2023Sex discriminationOfficer conduct.  No evidence of discrimination. Satisfied complaint dealt with appropriately.None.
DC1129/06/2023Sex discriminationOfficer conduct.No evidence of discrimination. Satisfied complaint dealt with appropriately.None.
DC1229/06/2023Sex discriminationOfficer conduct.No evidence of discrimination. Satisfied complaint dealt with appropriately.Logging complaints.
Q2 2023/24     
DC1320/07/2023Sex discriminationOfficer conduct.    No evidence of discrimination. Satisfied complaint dealt with appropriately.    None.
Public Ref.Dip-Check DateTheme/sSummaryOutcome of Dip-CheckLearning or Recommendation Theme
DC1414/09/2023Abuse of position / corruptionOfficer conduct.No evidence of misconduct. Complaint dealt with appropriately.None.
DC1507/09/2023Abuse of position to pursue an inappropriate relationshipOfficer conduct.No evidence of misconduct. Complaint dealt with appropriately.  IOPC Guidance.
DC1613/09/2023Abuse of position / corruptionOfficer conduct.  Officer was referred to Reflective Practice Review Process. Complaint dealt with appropriately.  Process.
DC1713/09/2023Organisational corruption, general level of serviceRequirement to arrest.Complaint dealt with appropriately.  Requirement to provide regular updates to complainant.
DC1813/09/2023Abuse of position / corruptionOfficer conduct.No evidence of misconduct. Complaint dealt with appropriately.None
DC1913/09/2023Abuse of position / corruptionOfficer conduct.Not a Surrey Officer. Complaint passed to relevant force.Should be de-recorded.
DC2019/09/2023Abuse of position for sexual purposeOfficer conduct.Officer put on Reflective Practice Review Process. Satisfied that the complaint was dealt with appropriately.  None
DC2118/09/2023Abuse of position for other purpose and general level of serviceOfficer conduct.No evidence of misconduct. Complaint dealt with appropriately.      None
Q3 2023/24     
DC2219/10/2023Abuse of position, pursuing inappropriate relationship.    Officer conduct.No evidence of misconduct. Complaint dealt with appropriately.  Mandatory referral to IOPC requirements.
Public Ref.Dip-Check DateTheme/sSummaryOutcome of Dip-CheckLearning or Recommendation Theme
DC2331/10/2023Police Staff ApplicationRejected police staff application.Satisfied decision to reject was appropriate and rationale was sound.  None
DC2431/10/2023Police Volunteer ApplicationRejected police volunteer applicationsSatisfied decision to reject was appropriate and rationale was sound.  None
DC2531/10/2023Police Officer ApplicationRejected police officer application.Satisfied decision to reject was appropriate and rationale was sound.  None
DC2631/10/2023Police Officer Application    Rejected police officer application.Satisfied decision to reject was appropriate and rationale was sound.  None.
DC2731/10/2023Police Staff ApplicationRejected police staff application.Satisfied decision to reject was appropriate and rationale was sound.  None.
DC2831/10/2023Police Staff ApplicationRejected police staff application.Satisfied decision to reject was appropriate and rationale was sound.  None.
DC2931/10/2023Police Officer ApplicationRejected police officer application.Satisfied decision to reject was appropriate and rationale was sound.  None.
DC3031/10/2023Police Staff ApplicationRejected police staff application.Vetting interview should have been offered before rejection.    Yes.  Re-open case and offer vetting interview.
DC3131/10/2023Police Officer ApplicationRejected police officer application.Satisfied decision to reject was appropriate and rationale was sound.  None.
DC3206/11/2023Police Staff ApplicationRejected police staff application.Satisfied decision to reject was appropriate and rationale was sound.  None.
DC3318/12/2023Police Officer ApplicationRejected police officer application.Satisfied decision to reject was appropriate and rationale was sound.          None.  
Public Ref.Dip-Check DateTheme/sSummaryOutcome of Dip-CheckLearning or Recommendation Theme
Q4 2023/24     
DC3405/03/2024General level of service and out of court disposalsComplaint about issue of out of custody disposal.Complaint handler found that the service provided was not acceptable. OPCC is satisfied that reasonable and proportionate action was taken in this case.Ensure proper administrative processes are followed.
DC3505/03/2024General level of service and police action following contactLack of police action.OPCC review found that the complaint handler considered all the circumstances of this complaint, and that reasonable and proportionate action was taken to address it.None.
DC3606/03/2024Police action following contactLack of referral to victim support services.Complaint handler considered all the circumstances of this complaint. OPCC satisfied reasonable and proportionate action was taken in this case.None.
DC3707/03/2024General level of service and police action following contactAlready subject of LPB review under Schedule 3 of the Police Reform Act 2002 so case not checked again.  –None.
DC3807/03/2024General level of service.Already subject of LPB review under Schedule 3 of the Police Reform Act 2002 so case does not warrant dip check again.  –None
DC3920/03/2024Authority, courtesy, and respect (and) discreditable conductUse of force.Complaint handler considered all the circumstances of this complaint. OPCC satisfied reasonable and proportionate action was taken in this case, however there were concerns about timeliness.  Yes. Allocation to a complaint handled delayed for no apparent reason.  
DC4027/03/2024Police Staff ApplicationRejected police staff application.Satisfied decision to reject was appropriate and rationale was sound.  None.
DC4127/03/2024Police Officer Application      Rejected police officer application.Vetting interview should have been offered before rejection.    Cultural awareness and need to offer a vetting interview.
Public Ref.Dip-Check DateTheme/sSummaryOutcome of Dip-CheckLearning or Recommendation Theme
DC4227/03/2024Police Staff ApplicationRejected police staff application.Satisfied decision to reject was appropriate and rationale was sound.  None.
DC4327/03/2024Police Staff ApplicationRejected police staff application.Satisfied decision to reject was appropriate and rationale was sound.  None.
DC4427/03/2024Police Staff ApplicationRejected police staff application.Satisfied decision to reject was appropriate and rationale was sound.  None.
Q1 2024/25     
DC4510/06/2024Discriminatory behaviourOfficer conduct.  OPCC satisfied that this complaint was dealt with reasonably (outside Schedule 3) and proportionately and the outcome was appropriate in the circumstances.  Ensure proper administrative process followed.  
DC4610/06/2024Stop and searchStop and search.Due to no contact from the CP, the complaint was unable to be progressed.Ensure proper administrative process followed.  
DC4710/06/2024Police powers, policies and procedures (and) stop and searchStop and search.  The complaint was dealt with promptly and to the satisfaction of the CP.  Ensure proper administrative process followed and regular updates provided to complainant.
DC4814/06/2024Unprofessional attitude and disrespect during stop check.Officer conduct.  No evidence of misconduct. Complaint dealt with appropriately.    Ensure proper administrative process followed        
DC4914/06/2024Police powers and procedures (and) power to arrest and detainStop and search.  The complaint was dealt with promptly and to the satisfaction of the CP.Ensure proper administrative process followed      
DC5021/06/2024Individual behaviours – overbearing or harassing  Stop and search.      OPCC satisfied that complaint was dealt with reasonably and proportionately and the outcome was appropriate in the circumstances.Ensure all points of complaint are properly recorded.
Public Ref.Dip-Check DateTheme/sSummaryOutcome of Dip-CheckLearning or Recommendation Theme
Q2 2024/25     
DC51UNDER OPCC REVIEWIndividual behaviours – overbearing or harassing  Requirement to arrest.UNDER OPCC REVIEWUNDER OPCC REVIEW
DC52UNDER OPCC REVIEW UNDER OPCC REVIEWUNDER OPCC REVIEWUNDER OPCC REVIEW
DC53UNDER OPCC REVIEW UNDER OPCC REVIEWUNDER OPCC REVIEWUNDER OPCC REVIEW
DC54UNDER OPCC REVIEW UNDER OPCC REVIEWUNDER OPCC REVIEWUNDER OPCC REVIEW
Q3 2024/25     
DC5521/11/2024Police officer application.Rejected police officer application.OPCC satisfied rejected appropriate and in line with the requirements of the Vetting APP and culture of Surrey Police.  None.
DC5621/11/2024Police officer application.Rejected police officer application.OPCC satisfied rejected appropriate and in line with the requirements of the Vetting APP and culture of Surrey Police.None.
DC5721/11/2024Police officer application.Rejected police officer application.OPCC satisfied rejected appropriate and in line with the requirements of the Vetting APP and culture of Surrey Police.  None.
DC5821/11/2024Police officer application.Rejected police officer application.OPCC satisfied rejected appropriate and in line with the requirements of the Vetting APP and culture of Surrey Police but the possibility of offering a vetting interview should have been considered.  More consideration should be given to offering vetting interviews before rejecting applications.
DC5921/11/2024Police officer application.Rejected police officer application.Following an appeal, officer was appointed under conditions. OPCC satisfied with this pragmatic approach.Wider team learning.
DC6021/11/2024Police officer application.       Police officer application.Officer was appointed under conditions. OPCC satisfied with this pragmatic approach.Wider team learning.
Public Ref.Dip-Check DateTheme/sSummaryOutcome of Dip-CheckLearning or Recommendation Theme
Q4 2024/25     
DC6125/02/2025Police powers, policies and procedures (and) discrimination  Vehicle stop and seizure.OPCC review found that the complaint handler considered all the circumstances of this complaint, and that reasonable and proportionate action was taken to address it.  Individual learning.
DC6225/02/2025Discriminatory behaviour.Allegations of bias due to skin colour.OPCC review found that the complaint handler considered all the circumstances of this complaint, and that reasonable and proportionate. No evidence of bias.  None.
DC6326/02/2025Discriminatory behaviour and delivery of duties and service.Vehicle stop and allegations of discriminatory behaviour.OPCC review found that the complaint handler considered all the circumstances of this complaint, and that reasonable and proportionate. No evidence of bias.  Need to follow force BWV policy.
DC6411/03/2025Police powers, policies and procedures  Stop and search.OPCC review found that the complaint handler considered all the circumstances of this complaint, and that the outcome reasonable and proportionate. No evidence of misconduct.  None
DC6511/03/2025Police powers, policies and proceduresStop and search.OPCC review found that the complaint handler considered all the circumstances of this complaint, and that the outcome reasonable and proportionate. No evidence of misconduct.None
DC6611/03/2025Police powers, policies and proceduresStop and search.OPCC review found that the complaint handler considered all the circumstances of this complaint, and that the outcome reasonable and proportionate.      None
Public Ref.Dip-Check DateTheme/sSummaryOutcome of Dip-CheckLearning or Recommendation Theme
DC6711/03/2025Use of force.Treatment and injury in custody.OPCC review found that the complaint handler considered all the circumstances of this complaint, and that reasonable and proportionate. Although restrained by offices, appropriate and approved techniques were used. No evidence of misconduct.Administrative regarding recording of complaint.
DC6811/03/2025Use of force.Treatment and injury in custody.OPCC dip check found that the matter was properly recorded and dealt with reasonably and proportionally. Reasonable and proportionate action was taken to address it. Filed due to lack of response from complainant.None.
DC6911/03/2025Use of force.Mistaken identify.OPCC dip check found that the matter was properly recorded and dealt with reasonably and proportionally. Reasonable and proportionate action was taken to address it. Complaint correctly filed due to lack of third-party consent.  Administrative regarding de-recording of complaint.
DC7011/03/2025Use of force.Allegations of use of force.OPCC dip check found that the matter was properly recorded and dealt with reasonably and proportionally.  Reasonable and proportionate action was taken to address it. Complainant declined to provide details so complaint correctly de-recorded.None.
Q1 2025/26     
DC7122/04/25Detective Constable Entry ProgrammeVetting rejection.OPCC satisfied rejected appropriate and in line with the requirements of the Vetting APP and culture of Surrey Police.None.
DC7222/04/25Police Constable Entry ProgrammeVetting rejection.OPCC satisfied rejected appropriate and in line with the requirements of the Vetting APP and culture of Surrey Police.None.
DC7322/04/25    Police Staff application    Vetting rejection.  OPCC satisfied rejected appropriate and in line with the requirements of the Vetting APP and culture of Surrey Police.None.
Public Ref.Dip-Check DateTheme/sSummaryOutcome of Dip-CheckLearning or Recommendation Theme
DC7422/04/25  Police Constable Entry ProgrammeVetting rejection. OPCC satisfied rejected appropriate and in line with the requirements of the Vetting APP and culture of Surrey Police.None.
DC7522/04/25Police Constable Entry ProgrammeVetting rejection.  OPCC satisfied rejected appropriate and in line with the requirements of the Vetting APP and culture of Surrey Police.None.
DC7622/04/25Police Constable Entry ProgrammeVetting rejection.  OPCC satisfied rejected appropriate and in line with the requirements of the Vetting APP and culture of Surrey Police.None.
DC7722/04/25Police Staff applicationVetting rejection.  OPCC satisfied rejected appropriate and in line with the requirements of the Vetting APP and culture of Surrey Police.None.
DC7822/04/25Police Constable Entry ProgrammeVetting rejection.  OPCC satisfied rejected appropriate and in line with the requirements of the Vetting APP and culture of Surrey Police.None.
DC7922/04/25Existing Police Officer internal moveVetting rejection.  OPCC satisfied rejected appropriate and in line with the requirements of the Vetting APP and culture of Surrey Police.None.
DC8022/04/25Police Staff applicationVetting rejection.  OPCC satisfied rejected appropriate and in line with the requirements of the Vetting APP and culture of Surrey Police.None.
DC8122/04/25Existing Police Officer internal moveVetting rejection.  OPCC satisfied rejected appropriate and in line with the requirements of the Vetting APP and culture of Surrey Police.None.
DC8222/04/25Police Staff applicationVetting rejection.  OPCC satisfied rejected appropriate and in line with the requirements of the Vetting APP and culture of Surrey Police.None.
DC8322/04/25Contractor for MTB redevelopmentVetting rejection.  OPCC satisfied rejected appropriate and in line with the requirements of the Vetting APP and culture of Surrey Police.None.
DC8422/04/25Police Staff applicationVetting rejection.  OPCC satisfied rejected appropriate and in line with the requirements of the Vetting APP and culture of Surrey Police.None.
DC8522/04/25Police Staff applicationVetting rejection.OPCC satisfied rejected appropriate and in line with the requirements of the Vetting APP and culture of Surrey Police.None.
DC8622/04/25Special Constable applicationVetting rejection.Appeal ongoing.Update required.
Public Ref.Dip-Check DateTheme/sSummaryOutcome of Dip-CheckLearning or Recommendation Theme
DC8722/04/25ContractorVetting rejection.OPCC satisfied rejected appropriate and in line with the requirements of the Vetting APP and culture of Surrey Police.None.
Q2 2025/26     
DC8827/07/2025Use of forceAllegations of assault by two police officers.OPCC review found that the complaint handler considered all the circumstances of this complaint, and that the outcome reasonable and proportionate. No evidence of misconduct.None.
DC8927/07/2025Delivery of duties and serviceComplaint about lack of police investigation.OPCC review found that the complaint handler considered all the circumstances of this complaint, and that the outcome reasonable and proportionate.None.
DC9027/07/2025Individual behavioursComplaint alleging a lack of fairness and impartiality plus concerns about access and disclosure of information.OPCC review found that the complaint handler considered all the circumstances of this complaint, and that the outcome reasonable and proportionate.None.
DC9127/07/2025ArrestAllegations of false arrest and miscommunication.Dip check by OPCC agrees with handling and outcome as being reasonable and proportionate. No evidence of misconduct.  None.
DC9227/07/2025Individual behavioursAllegations of mistreatment in custody, forced entry not being required and seizure of property.Dip check by OPCC agrees with handling and outcome as being reasonable and proportionate. No evidence of misconduct.None.
DC9327/07/2025ArrestComplaint about arrest and seizure of property.OPCC review found that the complaint handler considered all the circumstances of this complaint, and that the outcome reasonable and proportionate.None.
DC9427/07/2025Use of police vehiclesAllegations that a police car forced a member of the public to take action to avoid a collision.OPCC review found that the complaint handler considered all the circumstances of this complaint, and that the outcome reasonable and proportionate.None.
Public Ref.Dip-Check DateTheme/sSummaryOutcome of Dip-CheckLearning or Recommendation Theme
DC9527/07/2025Individual behavioursAllegations that a call handler was rude.Dip check by OPCC agrees with handling and outcome as being reasonable and proportionate. No evidence of misconduct.None.
DC9627/07/2025Individual behavioursComplaint alleges officers use threatening language and that they were unlawfully arrested.Dip check by OPCC agrees with handling and outcome as being reasonable and proportionate. No evidence of misconduct.None.
DC9727/07/2025Lack of actionComplainant unhappy with apparent lack of police action to progress their case and of unfairness.Dip check by OPCC agrees with handling and outcome as being reasonable and proportionate. No evidence of misconduct.None.
DC9827/07/2025Lack of actionComplainant unhappy with lack of contact and updates and alleges failure to safeguard them.OPCC review found that the complaint handler considered all the circumstances of this complaint, and that the outcome reasonable and proportionate.None.
DC9927/07/2025Not checkedWork flowed to OPCC to dip check but upon review had already or was currently being reviewed by OPCC/IOPC under Schedule 3 of the PRA 2002.Not checkedNone.
DC10027/07/2025Not checked  Work flowed to OPCC to dip check but upon review had already or was currently being reviewed by OPCC/IOPC under Schedule 3 of the PRA 2002.Not checked  None.
DC10127/07/2025Not checked  Work flowed to OPCC to dip check but upon review had already or was currently being reviewed by OPCC/IOPC under Schedule 3 of the PRA 2002.Not checked  None.
DC10227/07/2025Not checked  Work flowed to OPCC to dip check but upon review had already or was currently being reviewed by OPCC/IOPC under Schedule 3 of the PRA 2002.    Not checked  None.
Public Ref.Dip-Check DateTheme/sSummaryOutcome of Dip-CheckLearning or Recommendation Theme
DC10327/07/2025Not checked  Work flowed to OPCC to dip check but upon review had already or was currently being reviewed by OPCC/IOPC under Schedule 3 of the PRA 2002.Not checked  None.
DC10427/07/2025Not checked  Work flowed to OPCC to dip check but upon review had already or was currently being reviewed by OPCC/IOPC under Schedule 3 of the PRA 2002.Not checked  None.
DC10506/08/2025Vetting check – Internal moveCurrent PC application for internal move requiring increased vetting level. PSD requested hold due to ongoing conduct and complaint matters.OPCC agrees with decision.None.
DC10606/08/2025Vetting check – New applicantSeeking to transfer to SurPol. Background checks revealed several complaints and disciplinary matters so application rejected.OPCC agrees with decision.None.
DC10706/08/2025Vetting check – RejoinerAplicant to rejoin SurPol as PC but checks reveal adverse information so application rejected.OPCC agrees with decision.None.
DC10806/08/2025Vetting check – New applicantStaff application. Not checked by OPCC as subject to live appeal.Not checked.None.
DC10906/08/2025Vetting check – New applicantApplication for PCSO role. Checks revealed adverse information and non-disclosure of relevant matters. Application rejected.OPCC agrees with decision.None.
DC11006/08/2025Vetting check – New applicantApplication for PC role. Checks revealed adverse information. Application rejected.  OPCC agrees with decision.None.
DC11106/08/2025Vetting check – New applicantApplication for PCSO role but checks revealed adverse information. Application rejected.OPCC agrees with decision.None.
DC11206/08/2025Vetting check – Internal moveApplication to move internally rejected due to adverse information.OPCC agrees with decision.None.
DC11306/08/2025Vetting check – New applicantApplication subject to live appeal so not checked by OPCC.  Not checked.None.
Public Ref.Dip-Check DateTheme/sSummaryOutcome of Dip-CheckLearning or Recommendation Theme
Q3 2025/26     
DC11403/11/2025New applicantApplication for the Police Constable Entry Programme.Rejected due to honesty and integrity issues. OPCC agrees with decision.None.
DC11503/11/2025New applicantPolice Constable Entry Programme application.Rejected due to negative intelligence. OPCC agrees with decision.None.
DC11603/11/2025TransfereePolice Constable transfer from Metropolitan Police.Rejected due to negative intelligence. OPCC agrees with decision.  None.
DC11703/11/2025Police staffPolice staff application for 999 emergency call taker.Rejected due to negative intelligence. OPCC agrees with decision.  None.
DC11803/11/2025New applicantPolice Constable Entry Programme application.Rejected due to financial liabilities. OPCC agrees with decision.  None.
DC11903/11/2025New applicantApplication for Custody Detention Officer.Rejected due to financial liabilities. OPCC agrees with decision.  None.
DC12003/11/2025New applicantContractor application.Rejected due to negative intelligence. OPCC agrees with decision.  None.
DC12103/11/2025RejoinerRejoiner – PC.Rejected on basis of financial risk. OPCC agrees with decision.None.
DC12203/11/2025New applicantCareline/CCTV Operator application.Rejected due to negative intelligence. OPCC agrees with decision.None.
DC12303/11/2025New applicantApplication for Senior Liaison and Diversion PractitionerRejected due to honesty and integrity issues. OPCC agrees with decision.  None.
Q4 2025/26     
DC12429/01/2026New PC applicantApplication to become Surrey PCRejected due to integrity and past convictions. OPCC agrees with decision.None.
DC12529/01/2026New PC applicantApplication to become Surrey PCRejected due to negative intelligence. OPCC agrees with decision.  None.
DC12629/01/2026New PC applicantApplication to become Surrey PCRejected due to negative intelligence. OPCC agrees with decision.  None.
DC12729/01/2026New PC applicantApplication to become Surrey PCRejected due to negative intelligence. OPCC agrees with decision.None.
Public Ref.Dip-Check DateTheme/sSummaryOutcome of Dip-CheckLearning or Recommendation Theme
DC12829/01/2026New PC applicantApplication to become Surrey PCRejected due to negative intelligence. OPCC agrees with decision.  None.
DC12929/01/2026New PC applicantApplication to become Surrey PCRejected due to negative intelligence. OPCC agrees with decision.  None.
DC13029/01/2026New PC applicantApplication to become Surrey PCRejected due to potential conflict of interest and integrity issues. OPCC agrees with decision.  None.
Q1 2026/27     
DC13114/05/2026Transfer from another forcePC Transfer to SurreyRejected due to negative intelligence and associations. OPCC agrees with decision.None.
DC13214/05/2026Transfer from another forcePC Transfer to SurreyOPCC satisfied rejection appropriate and in line with the requirements of the Vetting APP and culture of Surrey Police.None.
DC13314/05/2026Re-joiner from another force.Application to rejoin as Surrey PCOPCC satisfied rejection appropriate and in line with the requirements of the Vetting APP and culture of Surrey Police.None.
DC13414/05/2026New Specials applicantApplication to become Surrey Special ConstableOPCC satisfied rejection appropriate and in line with the requirements of the Vetting APP and culture of Surrey Police.None.
DC13514/05/2026New DC applicantApplication to become Detective ConstableRejected due to integrity issues. OPCC agrees with decision.None.
DC13614/05/2026Special Constable applicantApplication to move up from PCSO to Special ConstableRejected due to adverse conduct history. OPCC agrees with decision.None.
DC13714/05/2026Learner Detective Constable applicantTransfer from another force to become learner Detective ConstableRejected due to adverse conduct history. OPCC agrees with decision.None.
DC13814/05/2026Detective Constable Entry ProgrammeApplication to join Surrey through the DCE programme.Rejected due to failure to meet residency criteria. OPCC agrees with decision.None.
DC13914/05/2026New PC applicant    Application to join Surrey as a PCRejected due to high risk associations. OPCC agrees with decision.None.
Public Ref.Dip-Check DateTheme/sSummaryOutcome of Dip-CheckLearning or Recommendation Theme
DC14014/05/2026Special Constable applicantApplication join Surrey as a Special ConstableRejected due to adverse conduct history. OPCC agrees with decision.None.
DC14114/05/2026Internal PC TransferApplication for internal transferRejected due to adverse conduct history. OPCC agrees with decision.None
DC14214/05/2026Re-joiner from another force.Application to rejoin as Surrey PCOPCC satisfied rejection appropriate and in line with the requirements of the Vetting APP and culture of Surrey Police.None.
DC14314/05/2026Detective Constable Entry ProgrammeApplication to join Surrey through the DCE programme.Rejected due to failure to meet residency criteria. OPCC agrees with decision.None.
Q2 2026/27     
DC14415/09/2026New PC applicantApplication to join Surrey as PCRejected due to adverse intelligence. OPCC agrees with decision.None.
DC14515/09/2026New PC applicantApplication to join Surrey as PCRejected due to adverse intelligence. OPCC agrees with decision.None.
DC14615/09/2026PC applicant.Transfer from another force to Surrey.Rejected due to adverse conduct history. OPCC agrees with decision.None.
DC14715/09/2026New PC applicant.Application to join Surrey as PCRejected due to financial vulnerabilities. OPCC agrees with decision.None.
DC14815/09/2026Police Staff applicant.Application to Surrey as emergency call handler.Rejected due to adverse intelligence on associations. OPCC agrees with decision.None.
DC14915/09/2026Police Staff applicant.Application to Surrey as emergency call handler.Rejected due to previous convictions. OPCC agrees with decision.None.
DC15015/09/2026Police Staff applicant.Application to Surrey as emergency call handler.Rejected due to adverse intelligence. OPCC agrees with decision.None.
DC15115/09/2026Volunteer applicantApplication to volunteer.Rejected due to failure to meet residency criteria. OPCC agrees with decision.None.
DC15215/09/2026Volunteer applicantApplication to volunteer.Rejected due to adverse intelligence. OPCC agrees with decision.None.
DC15328/09/2026New PC applicant.Appeal of previous vetting refusal.Appeal rejected due to adverse intelligence. OPCC agrees with decision.None.
DC15428/09/2026Serving Police StaffAppeal of previous vetting refusal.Appeal rejected due to business interest. OPCC agrees with decision.None.