Police and Crime Commissioner for Surrey – Decision Making Record
Report Title RASASC funding 2022
Decision number: 28/2022
Author and Job Role: Lucy Thomas, Commissioning & Policy Lead for Victim Services
Protective Marking: OFFICIAL
Police & Crime Commissioners have the statutory responsibility to provide services to support victims cope and recover. RASASC provide core rape and sexual assault services in Surrey through counselling and Independent Sexual Violence Advisors (ISVAs).
- RASASC has seen a year on year rise in referrals to their service. Since 2016 they have been awarded £187,000 per annum through grant agreements to support survivors of sexual assault and rape; £157,000 through the Victims’ Fund and an additional £30,000 through alternative funding streams. In 2022/23 to date they have been awarded £157,000 from the Victims’ Fund, the additional £30,000 recommended will bring their funding in line with previous years.
- An additional £30,000 is awarded to RASASC to support the delivery of counselling services for sexual assault and rape survivors.
Police and Crime Commissioner Approval
I approve the recommendation(s):
Signature: PCC Lisa Townsend (wet signed copy held in OPCC)
Date: 18th August 2022
All decisions must be added to the decision register.
Areas of consideration
Note any members of staff who have been consulted when writing paper.
Note any public / stakeholder consultation that has informed the paper.
What are the cost implications and in which years do they occur? How will it be paid for? If not applicable add ‘no implications’
Consider whether legal advice is required. If so, note any advice here.
Consider whether there are any legal implications to this paper. If so, note here.
Detail any risks associated with the recommendations listed or failing to adopt one of the recommendations.
Equality and diversity
Detail any equality and diversity implications associated with the options outlined or in failing to adopt one of the options. Include action planned to mitigate any inequalities. If not applicable add ‘no implications’.
Risks to human rights
Outline any risks to human rights that may occur as a result of any of the options outlined in the paper or failing to adopt one of the options. Include action planned to mitigate risks. If not applicable add ‘no risks’.