28 年 2022 日の決定 RASASC 資金調達 2022

サリー州の警察および犯罪コミッショナー - 意思決定記録

Report Title RASASC funding 2022

決定番号: 28/2022

著者と役職: Lucy Thomas、Victim Services のコミッショニングおよびポリシー リード

保護マーキング: 公式

エグゼクティブサマリー:

Police & Crime Commissioners have the statutory responsibility to provide services to support victims cope and recover. RASASC provide core rape and sexual assault services in Surrey through counselling and Independent Sexual Violence Advisors (ISVAs).

経歴

  • RASASC has seen a year on year rise in referrals to their service. Since 2016 they have been awarded £187,000 per annum through grant agreements to support survivors of sexual assault and rape; £157,000 through the Victims’ Fund and an additional £30,000 through alternative funding streams. In 2022/23 to date they have been awarded £157,000 from the Victims’ Fund, the additional £30,000 recommended will bring their funding in line with previous years.

おすすめ

  • An additional £30,000 is awarded to RASASC to support the delivery of counselling services for sexual assault and rape survivors.

警察および犯罪委員の承認

推奨事項を承認します:

署名: PCC Lisa Townsend (OPCC 所蔵の湿式署名コピー)

日付:18年2022月XNUMX日

すべての決定は、決定レジスタに追加する必要があります。

考慮事項

コンサルティング

Note any members of staff who have been consulted when writing paper.

Note any public / stakeholder consultation that has informed the paper.

財務上の影響

What are the cost implications and in which years do they occur? How will it be paid for? If not applicable add ‘no implications’

リーガルポリシー

Consider whether legal advice is required. If so, note any advice here.

Consider whether there are any legal implications to this paper. If so, note here.

リスク

Detail any risks associated with the recommendations listed or failing to adopt one of the recommendations.

平等と多様性

Detail any equality and diversity implications associated with the options outlined or in failing to adopt one of the options. Include action planned to mitigate any inequalities. If not applicable add ‘no implications’.

人権へのリスク

Outline any risks to human rights that may occur as a result of any of the options outlined in the paper or failing to adopt one of the options. Include action planned to mitigate risks. If not applicable add ‘no risks’.